Peer to peer file share

I think the real issue to the big picture related to the destruction of peer to peer sharing is what this movement goes toward, and what it implies about value of work. And that leads to the question, is one person more valuable than another? I would say yes, but that gets very freakin complicated and controversial. But at it's current state the individuals' value has grown far too exponentially instead of gaining what's necessary. Which, ironically, puts the worker further in the hole where he is forced to 'steal' the music he 'wants'. And a cause for this, under our wack capitolism, is industry buying people and making money off things that they don't even have a part in, except the fact that they 'bought' them. And this would imply that there was never true emancipation... and industry is slave owners, and musicians are the black people, and people are the crops (grown and harvested). All the while using a fucked up structure of price, capitalizing on the fire of yourn for music, exploiting both the artist and the worker of their love, and these corporate pricks are the richest and with the least contribution to society. I'm really pissed and fleshing this philosophy out alot right now. Actually to the point where i can't cooperate in school because that even is starting to look like propaganda bull shit...(Religion and structure don't mix with liars and cheaters, thanks for layin this issue on us god)... Makes me wonder about God sometimes. Is he the predator? But i'm making ground. Great article we got here http://www.demonbaby.com/blog/2007/10/ when-pigs-fly-death-of-oink-birth-of.html. I guess music is a start... And no i'm not a damn commy. But either way you look at it. the steps we need to make kindof look that way. Guess it would if you're trying to make a movement where it's fair instead of oppressed.